Biblioteca clínica

Modelos

Entra para guardar tu sesión o suscríbete para abrir la biblioteca completa. Puedes seguir gratis con fichas parciales.

¿Prefieres esperar? Déjame tu correo: te aviso cuando abra el acceso completo y tendrás precio de fundador.

TU MENTOR · ATLASAtlas de la psicoterapia
Vista
Home

Integrative · 2001

Sensorimotor Psychotherapy

Trauma changes when the body can observe, regulate and transform the implicit responses with which it continues to organise the present as a threat.

Sensorimotor Psychotherapy is an integrative, phased approach to trauma, dissociation and attachment wounds that uses present bodily experience as the primary route for assessment and intervention. It holds that post-traumatic suffering is expressed in a somatic narrative made up of sensations, posture, orientation, breathing, movements, action impulses, autonomic arousal and procedural relational patterns that persist even when the person understands narratively what happened to them. Treatment combines directed mindfulness, clinical tracking of experience, somatic resources, collaborative experiments, gradual memory processing and exploration of the bond in order to widen the window of tolerance, complete or reorganise truncated defensive tendencies, update implicit meanings and recover a more flexible participation in life, relationships, pleasure and everyday action. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006; Ogden and Fisher, 2015; Ogden, 2021).

Theory of change

Change consolidates when the person regulates arousal, observes their implicit bodily patterns and rehearses present actions that update memory, attachment and meaning.

Core ideas

  1. Trauma persists as an implicit bodily organisation

    Sensorimotor Psychotherapy holds that the after-effects of trauma do not depend solely on narrative recall, but on procedural configurations that organise sensation, arousal, posture, orientation, action and relational expectation. A person can therefore understand the past intellectually and go on reacting as if the threat were present. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006; Ogden and Fisher, 2015).

  2. Present experience is the place where the past becomes visible

    The model does not require an exhaustive history of the trauma to be reconstructed immediately in order to work clinically. When a significant topic is evoked, the past becomes observable in the here and now through changes in breathing, tone, gaze, sensation, impulse, emotion, meaning and relationship; the intervention is directed at this present organisation in order to update it safely. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006).

  3. Stabilisation is a condition of processing

    Work with traumatic memories is integrative only when the person can maintain sufficient presence and regulation. Stabilisation does not amount to avoiding the trauma indefinitely, but to developing the somatic, relational and attentional resources that make it possible to approach fragments of experience without repeating flooding, collapse or disconnection. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006; Ogden and Fisher, 2015).

  4. Observing transforms being absorbed by the reaction

    Directed mindfulness creates a decisive clinical difference between being taken over by the traumatic reaction and being able to observe how it is organised. By describing a sensation, an impulse or a posture within a regulating relationship, the person can sustain dual awareness and recover room for choice over processes that previously occurred automatically. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006; Ogden and Fisher, 2015).

  5. Defensive responses require recognition and reorganisation

    Traumatic defences are considered attempts at survival that may have been interrupted, inhibited, over-activated or fixed out of context. Treatment seeks to recognise the signs of orientation, withdrawal, protection, fight, flight, freezing or seeking support and to develop present actions that restore efficacy without turning therapy into a cathartic discharge. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006).

  6. Bodily resources constitute a basis for agency

    Grounding, alignment, centring, breathing, containment, mobility, orientation and boundaries are not mere relaxation exercises: they are bodily experiences of support, presence and capacity that can contradict learned helplessness. Practising them repeatedly widens the repertoire of responses and makes it possible to address more charged material later. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006; Ogden and Fisher, 2015).

  7. Attachment is also organised in proximity, distance and movement

    Attachment experiences shape non-verbal expectations about contact, gaze, voice, help, boundary and safety. The therapeutic relationship makes it possible to observe these embodied expectations and to rehearse new configurations of proximity, difference, co-regulation and repair that can be generalised to present bonds. (Ogden and Fisher, 2015; Ogden, 2021).

  8. Life after trauma requires recovering pleasure, play and participation

    The final phase goes beyond the aim of reducing symptoms: it seeks to enable the person to mobilise action systems linked to exploration, connection, work, creativity, pleasure, play and proportionate risk. Change consolidates when the organism stops devoting most of its resources to defence and can respond to the opportunities of current life. (Ogden, Minton and Pain, 2006; Ogden and Fisher, 2015).

  9. The body is always lived within a social and cultural context

    The experience of safety, threat, contact, emotional expression and bodily boundary is shaped by culture, racism, gender, disability, sexuality, class, community and power relations. The contemporary updating of the model places cultural humility and attention to oppression as requirements for not unduly individualising bodily responses that are also contextual. (Ogden, 2021).

Influences

  • Hakomi
  • Body psychotherapy and somatic psychology
  • Attachment theory
  • Theory of structural dissociation and action systems
  • Research on trauma and implicit memory
  • Mindfulness
  • Interpersonal neurobiology

Key references

  • Ogden, P., y Minton, K. (2000). Sensorimotor psychotherapy: One method for processing traumatic memory. Traumatology, 6(3), 149–173. https://doi.org/10.1177/153476560000600302
  • Ogden, P., Minton, K., y Pain, C. (2006). Trauma and the Body: A Sensorimotor Approach to Psychotherapy. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Ogden, P., y Fisher, J. (2015). Sensorimotor Psychotherapy: Interventions for Trauma and Attachment. W. W. Norton & Company.
  • Ogden, P. (2021). The Pocket Guide to Sensorimotor Psychotherapy in Context. W. W. Norton & Company.